Cal St. Northridge
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
976  Rachel Naumann JR 21:30
1,970  Rachael Duriez SR 22:31
2,051  Katie Alvarenga SO 22:36
2,613  Jasmine Vasquez JR 23:21
2,714  Cynthia Martinez SO 23:33
2,830  Kimberly Newton JR 23:48
2,942  Bianca Fraust FR 24:05
3,090  Cynthia Kelso FR 24:29
National Rank #261 of 344
West Region Rank #34 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rachel Naumann Rachael Duriez Katie Alvarenga Jasmine Vasquez Cynthia Martinez Kimberly Newton Bianca Fraust Cynthia Kelso
UC Riverside Invitational 09/17 1322 21:32 22:21 22:28 23:29 24:02 24:04 23:51 23:58
CXC West Region Preview 10/01 1316 21:20 22:24 22:49 23:30 23:35 23:32 23:48 25:13
Highlander Invitational 10/15 1292 21:22 22:46 22:45 22:58 23:03 24:36 24:17
Big West Championship 10/29 1316 22:02 22:17 22:48 23:14 23:17 24:25 24:10 24:40
West Region Championships 11/11 1323 21:25 22:36 22:29 23:31 23:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.1 1008 0.1 0.2 0.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rachel Naumann 122.2
Rachael Duriez 200.8
Katie Alvarenga 206.5
Jasmine Vasquez 237.2
Cynthia Martinez 243.5
Kimberly Newton 249.9
Bianca Fraust 255.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 0.8% 0.8 31
32 2.9% 2.9 32
33 12.3% 12.3 33
34 61.4% 61.4 34
35 17.7% 17.7 35
36 3.8% 3.8 36
37 0.9% 0.9 37
38 0.2% 0.2 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0